What brands do you associate with?

Brands once denoted iconised lifestyle – an out of reach aspiration for the middle class. Brand signified quality, exclusivity and a whopping price tag.

Gradually, the brand makers realized the necessity of a greater outreach. Outlets mushroomed. Products were tailored for a larger segment with procurement power. Soon brand adherence became a culture underpinning the purchase preference of the consumers. 

The make, design, texture and look became brand identifiers. If you possessed one your neighbours were sure to have one (if not more) too.

We are all infected by the techno fever. We all hanker to be the trendsetter. We all suffer from an acute sense of deprivation constantly injected by advertisers.

Having said that, I do use a mix of brands and local makes. Many times I find the latter more cost effective, durable, handy and reliable.

Higher technology invariably ups the maintenance cost. In the race to be one step ahead brands are now enhancing products with multiple technologies which are not always in sync with the environmental conditions. The sales tactic is to brainwash the buyer to believe that without ‘the latest’ life is non-functional.

So what does brand abidance result in ? A quaint solidarity amongst shoppers who think, behave and act in the way they have been fed to expending more on a purchase whose redundancy is guaranteed sooner or later.

Unknown's avatar

About gc1963

A working woman with interests in reading, writing, music, poetry and fine arts.

9 responses »

  1. Sadje's avatar Sadje says:

    I buy things based of their utility and value for money.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. I agree with your point of view.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I admire this perspective—choosing utility over brands really shows wisdom and practicality.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply