I come back again with a Pakistani Serial recently watched. It deals with contemporary social issues which require to be addressed from the standpoint of an alternate perspective.
Dastak directed by Marina Khan deals with broken marriage, rehabilitation of a divorced mother and societal stigma with regard to single parenting.
Soon after finishing college Kiran is married off to an unhappy man, Saif, who doesn’t want to be married despite doubts raised by Kiran’s progressive maternal uncle. In no time Kiran realizes that her husband is in love with another woman, Faryal, and her presence from her life cannot be obliterated. Her in-laws are aware of this illegitimate alliance yet have compelled their son to marry Kiran because they do not approve of this other girl.
Kiran tries hard to adjust considering the feelings of her own parents. She is liked by all except her husband. But the constant shadow of the other woman in her life and her husband’s displaced anger manifesting in aggression and violent reactions towards her foil all her efforts to elevate a dysfunctional marital existence into successful conjugal harmony.
A day comes when she has to leave her husband and also her new born baby in a fit of impatience and frustration. But she soon realises that she cannot stay away from her infant son, Shani. Her husband is also not interested in keeping the baby. So he barters the baby boy for freedom giving full custody of the child to Kiran.
Divorce follows. Faryal and Saif get married. But it’s an unhappy marriage as the mother-in-law cannot accept Faryal and keeps comparing her with Kiran. Further, it also subsequently comes to light that Faryal can never bear a child.
On the other hand, Kiran struggles to become financially independent with her mother’s support. Her father, of course, is dead against her career of an event planner which entails flexi timing, late home coming, leaving the child with her parents due to unavoidably prolonged working hours. Ultimately, Kiran decides to have her own set up forced by her father’s obstinacy.
At this juncture, Moieez, Kiran’s former college mate, re-enters her life. Moieez belongs to an affluent family and has always nurtured soft feelings for her though unexpressed. He now wants to marry her. But Kiran is undecided because she knows Moieez’s father does not want a divorcee as his daughter-in-law. He also suspects that she is a gold digger.
However, on Moieez’s insistence they get married. Moieez has a beautiful relationship with Kiran’s son. All are happy together except the father-in-law who has somehow grudgingly accepted Kiran but not her son, Shani. To make things worse, Kiran’s ex-husband, Saif, now wants his son back because he is his blood, right ? Kiran does not know how to handle this chaotic situation because she has never told Shani about his biological father.
How will Kiran cope with the overbearing stress of an uncooperative father-in-law whom Shani has nicknamed “Monster Uncle” ? How will she save her second marriage with a man she loves and respects? What will happen to Shani when he is told that Moieez is not his real father?
The narrative of this engrossing serial becomes all the more relevant in the backdrop of the joint family system wherein the patriarch is the decisive figure as to how the women and even the men of the household are to conduct their lives. Kiran’s first marriage is her father’s decision. He has difficulty in accepting the failure of the marriage arranged by him. After the fateful divorce he wants his daughter to consider re-marriage without being sympathetic to her wish to become financially secure to bring up her son without anyone’s help.
Kiran agrees to marry Moieez , in spite of her would-be father-in-law’s unwillingness, to fill up the vacuum in Shani’s life created by the lack of a father figure. Moieez fits in perfectly. The dichotomy in father-in-law daughter-in- law equation wherein the former has reservations in accepting a divorcee of a bahu (daughter-in-law) along with a son by her first marriage is a burning example of effete and hypocritical norms. The woman of the house has to be so called pious, pure, puritan (read untouched) whereas his own wife (Kiran’s mother-in-law) dedicatedly runs an NGO defending and rehabilitating hapless and helpless women (like Kiran?).
The three sixty degree turn in Saif’s attitude to get back his son after five years of ex-communication is again driven by preconceived and prejudicial societal expectations. He wants his authentic bloodline to carry forward the family name completely refuting the idea of an adopted son whom his wife Faryal is emotionally and psychologically attached to. Selfish again he forgets how for a short term gain he himself had given up his son when the child needed him the most.
Dastak means a knock not only to wake the viewers up to these glaring issues marring the progress of a society by at least starting a conversation if not by instigating a retaliation but also to think how to actively participate in changing the narration. Therein lies the power of social drama aimed to instill the dire necessity of imminent change in approach and outlook towards women – their plight under patriarchy even though they are so called educated and conscious of imperatives to better their lives – pulled back by existing agencies of social system which are blind to the sunshine of adaptivity and evolution.
The Serial has some power packed performances especially by Sohay Ali Abro as Kiran and Ali Raza as Moieez lending authenticity to the storyline. Their emotional togetherness fraught with hardships , unduly inflicted by their own near and dear ones, mirrors the regression embedded even in upper class ‘enlightened’ society, irrespective of urbanization and the endeavours of developing nations to become unified into the matrix of a world fast graduating into a global entity culturally fusing the West with the East in the wake.
Surprisingly and interestingly, the Serial also calls for a re-alignment in the protagonists’ mindsets too for a more inclusive and positive upbringing of the next generation emerging out of broken families who are the biggest sufferers in the bargain.
In brief, Dastak reinforces that no relationship or experience in life can be water-tightly compartmentalized into categories of black and white ignoring the ever present shades of grey. While taking into cognizance the choice of path onward, which may be uneasy but correct, thorny yet in the long run fruitful, the prospect of a fuller, healthier and more encompassing canvas is required to be perceived and sought overlooking the immediate frictions and factions which may colour perceptions for the time being with personal biases and prejudged notions.
Pic from Google
Thank you, Geeta, for such a heartwarming and moving review of the inspiring TV series. For me, it is especially interesting, as I have a great interest in India, given that I come from Poland, which was under Russian rule for 200 years. I hope that cultural progress continues, although many arranged marriages are happy.
Joanna
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes. You are correct. Nothing against arranged marriage. But yes marriages which are not founded on mutual consent may have breaking points. Really nice to see your interest in the sub continent.
LikeLike
Thank you, Geeta, my interest in India stems from my love of Tagore’s poetry and India’s oldest civilisation in the world, over 10.000 years, which is impressive as in Europe we were still living in caves, while ancient sages were having great achievements in science. If you ever have time, please look up my posts about Ramanyan, India – the Empire of the Spirit, Ma Ganga, it will be enough to give you an idea about my genuine interest in your unique country.
Joanna
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Joanna,🙏
Your heartfelt and thoughtful comments truly touched my heart. To see someone from a distant land like Poland take such a deep and sincere interest in the soul, culture, and literature of India reaffirms the belief that some connections transcend borders they are made soul to soul.
Your bond with Tagore’s poetry surely resonates with that subtle string which connects humanity to a greater cosmic consciousness. When you speak of ancient India, where sages once excelled in science, art, and spirituality, it is not merely history you’re recalling it is the memory of a timeless journey of the soul that still breathes within us.
It was a joy to read that you are drawn to the Ramayana, Ma Ganga, and the “Empire of the Spirit.” These are not just symbols; they are vibrant embodiments of India’s spiritual essence that have, through millennia, kept us rooted to our origins.
Your presence and perspective bring a rare richness to this dialogue forming a bridge between East and West, not just through words, but through shared emotion and deep understanding.
With regards,
Vijay
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, dear Vijay, for your beautiful comments! Please remember that there is only one race, human race. I am sure that you know Tagore poetry and writing, but if you wish to know why I love his work so much, read my first post in the Great Books of the World devoted to him and also to Kalidasa, the author of the famous poem about the cloud, which inspired many creations in music and poetry in much later time in history.
Joanna
LikeLiked by 2 people
My respect towards your passion for world literature is growing every moment. Humbled and honoured by your presence on my post.
LikeLike
Thank you, Geeta, but honour and pleasure in reading your post is all my!
Joanna
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Joanna,
Thank you so much for your warm and thoughtful words. I completely agree there is only one true race, the human race, and it is through art, poetry, and mutual understanding that we continue to reaffirm our shared humanity.
Yes, I do admire Tagore’s poetry deeply his words carry a timeless resonance that transcends boundaries. I will surely read your first post devoted to both Tagore and Kalidasa. What a beautiful pairing two luminous minds whose verses still echo across time!
Your mention of Kalidasa’s poem about the cloud (Meghadūta) reminded me how ancient Indian literature continues to inspire creative expressions globally. I’m truly grateful for your recommendation and the passion you bring to literature.
Looking forward to reading more of your reflections.
With warm regards,
Vijay
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, dear Vijay, for your beautiful reply! You are spot on about Indian influence on the world. That is why I admire your extraordinary country!
Joanna
LikeLiked by 2 people
Dear Joanna,🙏
If India has any influence in the world, it is through the quiet expression of its inner values Dharma, compassion, and equanimity. This influence is not a display of power, but a silent resonance that reaches hearts open to truth and beauty.
When you say, “God lives in our hearts and inspires our actions,” you beautifully echo the very soul of Indian spiritual philosophy. When our actions are aligned with Dharma, it is not only the individual but the entire society that begins to move toward the divine.
Your sensitivity transforms this exchange from a mere conversation into a soulful connection. For that, I offer my heartfelt thanks.
With warm regards and respect,
Vijay
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, dear Vijay, for your thoughtful reply! Your wise words are deeply appreciated!
Joanna
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Dastak” A One-Dimensional Portrayal of a Sensitive Theme
I, recently watched on an OTT platform, the Pakistani drama “Dastak” touches upon pressing contemporary social issues such as broken marriages, the rehabilitation of single mothers, and the stigma surrounding single parenting.
While it is commendable that director Marina Khan and the writing team have dared to bring such themes into the mainstream narrative, the unfortunate reality is that these issues are often portrayed with more emotional sensationalism than intellectual depth.
This disconnect forms the central flaw of the series a sensitive subject reduced to emotional outbursts and moral binaries, leaving little room for nuanced reflection that such themes demand from the audience.
Kiran, who could have emerged as a strong, independent female lead, is repeatedly shown entangled in her emotional vulnerabilities. Her decision to leave her newborn, return later, then remarry without revealing the truth to her son these appear to be more convenient plot devices than realistic character development rooted in psychological complexity.
Characters like Saif and Faryal, who could have embodied the psychological conflict of flawed individuals, are instead reduced to mere antagonists. The writing simplifies the ethical dilemma of parenting and paternity into a binary of “blood vs. upbringing,” denying viewers a chance to explore the deeper human questions involved.
Moieez, while being a supportive male counterpart, is portrayed as constantly caught between his love for Kiran and his father’s rigid expectations. The series fails to explore a reconciliatory or evolving model of patriarchal authority, instead choosing to depict it as unyielding and oppressive without counterbalance.
Most glaringly, while the drama claims to amplify the voice of strong women, it simultaneously reinforces their dependence on male characters and relationships for identity and validation. This contradiction weakens the show’s ideological foundation.
The article rightly highlights several important themes and attempts to bring forth the core issues of the narrative. However, we must now move beyond merely identifying problems, and begin to ask Is portraying a problem enough, or must storytelling also carry the responsibility of offering sensitivity, solutions, or at least broader perspectives?
In the end, “Dastak” may indeed be a knock but it merely knocks on the door. To truly open that door, the writing and direction must evolve with greater maturity and narrative balance.
-Vijay Srivastava
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems you have watched the serial. I guess we need to acknowledge the interdependence of male female coexistence without excluding one from the other. In doing so we should not convert the portrayal of a struggling woman into a super human being who can do without male support. It’s my personal opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your response, Geeta ji.🙏
The way you have highlighted the interdependence of men and women in society is indeed thoughtful and worth reflecting upon. In any social structure, the participation of both is essential that is beyond question.
However, serials like Dastak do not intend to negate the role of men, but rather aim to bring forth those circumstances where women are often left to navigate challenges on their own. Portraying such struggle is not about turning the female protagonist into a ‘superhuman’, but about acknowledging the reality many women face daily.
I believe that through such dialogues, we can better understand each other’s perspectives and move towards a more balanced and inclusive vision of coexistence.
Your thoughtful engagement is truly appreciated many thanks.🌹
LikeLiked by 1 person
I completely understand and appreciate your viewpoint. These dialogic exchanges are most enriching and helpful in developing a perspective.
In continuation of the same I would like to add that women fighting against all odds are not above emotional vulnerabilities though they may put up a brave front. They are entitled to their weak moments and apprehensions in relation to those they feel protective about.
Moieez, do remember, is also a son as much as he is a supportive husband. It’s normal for him to be in a tug of war between getting a little intimidated by his father whom he looks up to and emotionally dominated by an ailing mother as well as manipulated by a doting aunt.
I don’t perceive Saif and Faryal as antagonists. They are just characters flawed by extreme self centred ness. But in the long run they learn from their mistakes and evolve.
So does Kiran who acknowledges Saif ‘s rightful presence in Shani’s life and allows him passage leading to a harmonious equilibrium.
Perhaps a little too optimistic but the end note shows a direction which may be taken as a positive way forward towards cohesive familial bond(?).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your perspective is remarkably sensitive and balanced. The way you’ve highlighted the inner complexities of the female characters is truly commendable. Acknowledging that “even struggling women are entitled to moments of vulnerability” reflects a deeply humanistic view, often overlooked in narratives.
The inner conflict of Moeez being torn between his roles as a son, husband, and a family member is portrayed with subtle insight in your comment. It helps us understand that he is not just battling circumstances but also emotional entanglements within relationships.
Your refusal to label Saif and Faryal as mere antagonists, and instead viewing them as self-centered yet potentially evolving characters, shows a mature and nuanced understanding. This interpretation lifts the story beyond a simplistic good-vs-evil dichotomy and anchors it in lifelike reality.
Kiran’s acceptance and her willingness to allow Saif a rightful place in Shani’s life does indeed indicate a “positive direction,” as you suggest. While the ending may appear a bit idealistic, it does inspire a sense of hope for reconciliation and restructured familial bonds.
-Vijay
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for understanding my view point. I hope I have not offended you in any way.
I respect your reflective comments in my post.
Namaste
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your kind and thoughtful message. Please be assured there was absolutely nothing offensive in your words. On the contrary, I deeply value your openness, the clarity of your perspective, and the grace with which you express it.
Our exchange of ideas has been most enriching not just in understanding the characters, but in exploring the subtle human truths they represent. Your insights invite reflection, and I hold them in high regard.
Namaste and warm regards,
Vijay
LikeLiked by 1 person
Marriage is indeed one of the most toughest things you will commit to in your life, amongst moving housework a new career move.
I do find it quite sad how any society behaves towards women in general. Even when a woman is doing right – its somehow wrong . . . .marrying and staying in a marriage where everyone loves you but your husband – there is no point. Your life and happiness will not solely be with your husbands family, their approval of you and how well thought of you are by all relatives and friends means nothing if the one person who is supposed to give you utmost attention – doesn’t.
A woman makes a decision, which she doesn’t come to lightly, takes the enormous step to separate from her husband and yet she frowned upon, sadness is, she is frowned upon and judged by other woman, who have probably lived thru or been in the same position themselves. Whether there is a little resentment there that they were not courageous enough to take that step, who knows. A lot of other factors come in to play, what will people say, the stigma on family, and does have the support and finance to break away.
Then children come in to play. Once divorced she cares for her children and when her ex feels like it, wishes to be a part of their lives again. Which he can and is allowed to be, the decision whether he will be allowed to is on the children. When young they are innocent and not aware of the ways of the world but grow wiser as they grow up.
These topics one could discuss all day and night. There is no right or wrong, there is only the decisions we make for ourselves, our happiness and safety. As much as society is adjusting there will always be those that do not budge, or adjust to changing ways of the world, being judgemental to all, except when it is them in that very situation.
I feel that dramas, serials or films should portray the issue but with a more positive outcome to prove its hard but its not the end of the world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suggest you see this drama. I hope you will like it.
LikeLike
thank you, will definitely look in to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person